▶ Video explainer coming soon
The appeals court said the doctor's expert opinion was not good enough. The expert did not address the specific claim that Barabe failed to order necessary diagnostic tests. The expert also did not clearly state what the standard of care required or explain how Barabe met it. Finally, the expert's statements about whether Barabe's actions caused the death were too vague. Because of these gaps, the doctor did not meet his initial burden. The court reversed the dismissal and sent the malpractice claim, along with the hospital's liability claim, back for further proceedings.
A 36-year-old woman arrived at Lutheran Medical Center's emergency room complaining of a migraine headache that had lasted one day. Dr. David Barabe examined her and sent her home with a migraine diagnosis. She later saw her primary doctor and returned to the ER with ongoing headache complaints. She died weeks later from a subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is bleeding around the brain. Her family sued Barabe and the hospital, claiming he failed to get a proper medical history and failed to order tests that could have caught her condition. The hospital and doctor asked the court to dismiss the case before trial.
In medical malpractice cases, a defendant asking for early dismissal must show either that they followed the accepted standard of care, or that any mistake did not cause the patient's injury. The question here was whether the doctor's expert witness gave enough detail to meet that requirement, or whether the claims should go to a jury instead.
This case shows that in New York, a defendant cannot win dismissal with weak or vague expert statements. Experts must specifically address each claim of negligence and clearly explain the standard of care and causation. This ruling helps clarify what proof doctors and hospitals need to end a malpractice case early.
Talk to a licensed medical malpractice lawyer in New York.